Since 9/11 we have now spent billions of dollars on new security
systems around the nation. Has it been worth it?
July 28th three peace activists, including an 82
year old nun, cut through the security fences around the Highly Enriched
Uranium Materials Facility — a new windowless, half-billion-dollar building encircled
by enormous guard towers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory -- splashed the
building with blood and hung banners on it, and were not noticed by the
multi-million dollar security network of sensors and cameras and security
patrols until they walked up to a police car and voluntarily gave themselves
up.
August 10th Daniel Casillo was on a jet ski in
Jamaca Bay, just off of John F. Kennedy airport when it broke down. He swam ashore, and despite all the security
cameras and sensors climbed the airport fence, and walked dripping wet all the
way across the airport and the airport runways to the Delta terminal, trying
all the way to get noticed and rescued. Yet the multi-million dollar security
system didn’t pick him up until he went up to a baggage handler and asked for
help.
Government agencies testing the TSA system by trying to
smuggle guns or knives past the inspectors report success about 70% of the time
at some major airports. In December 2010 Houston businessman Farid Sief accidentally
brought his loaded pistol on a flight from Houston’s Bush Intercontinental
Airport. The TSA never found it, even though it was in his briefcase and should
have shown up clearly in the X-ray examination. In the same month the TSA’s
new director admitted that every test gun, bomb part or knife got past
screeners at some of the airports tested.
What does this tell us?
It tells us what we have all suspected anyway going through
the TSA inspections at airports – much of this money has been spent for show
rather than for effective security.