Tuesday, November 6, 2012

My ideal presidential candidate

Having just complained about the choices on offer in this presidential election, perhaps I ought to suggest what I would like to have seen on offer.  My “perfect” candidate would have:

1.       Offered a plan for progressively reducing the federal deficit and debt over the next decade or so, probably by a mix of higher taxes and reduced government spending along the lines suggested by the Simpson-Bowles commission (which Obama chartered, but then pointedly ignored when he didn’t like the result).

2.       Proposed to massively simplify and reform the income tax system, eliminating all or almost all of the special interest deductions and loopholes, simplifying the nightmare complexity of the 70,000+ pages of tax code, and reducing the corporate tax rate (which almost no one pays because of all the loopholes) to something more in line with our competitors in the world market.

3.       Admitted that entitlement programs, especially Medicare, are on track to bankrupt the country in the coming decades, and proposed at the very least to start a national debate on how best to reform them to make them financially sustainable.

4.       Admitted  that the 2000+ page “Obamacare” bill, well-intentioned as it might have been, is proving to be a disaster (companies are already beginning to shift full-time jobs to part-time jobs – less than 30 hours per week– to avoid the bill’s insurance requirements) , and proposed a much more comprehensive, less ideological  examination of the entire health care issue.

5.       Admitted that private enterprise, especially small businesses, account for most of the jobs in this country and all of the federal revenue, and proposed plans to make federal government regulations less expensive, arbitrary and inflexible and more business-friendly.

6.       Admitted that America needs immigrants, and proposed immigration reforms that would (a) have made it easy for more immigrants, especially high-skill immigrants, to come to this country to work and start businesses, and (b) offered a guest worker visa program for the low skill immigrants we need to pick crops and work in meat packing plants, etc.

7.       Understood that we spend far, far too much on our military, and that we could cut the military budget in half and still spend more than the next 14 nations combined, including China and Russia.  Of course the cuts would need to be made rationally on the basis of what the military really needs, not on the basis of which Congressional delegation has the most influence.

8.       Admitted that climate change is quite evidently going on, and human activity is quite likely a major driver, and proposed at least to fund more basic research to better understand the problem and its consequences.

9.       Understood that in todays’ technologically-driven world, educating our workforce adequately is key to maintaining our economic dominance in the world, and proposed some new and innovative approaches (more than just throwing more federal dollars at the problem) to improving American education, especially in the K-12 range. And that would include breaking the teacher’s union’s opposition to reforms.

Of course, since some of these are anathema to Democrats, and some are anathema to Republicans, any candidate who held these positions would never make it through their own party’s primaries, let alone have a chance in a general election.  More’s the pity…….