Wednesday, May 23, 2018

Election interference

It takes some work, amidst all the Washington posturing and spin and claims and counter-claims, to work out what really happened in the last election. But by now a few things are pretty clear.

1.      The Russians, or at least some subgroup probably not officially part of the government but actually under government sponsorship, did try to stir things up via social media, and by hacking the poorly protected emails servers of several political groups. In general the effort seems to have been pretty ham-handed, especially the social media part. None of this is surprising – the US has a history of doing the same to other nations; indeed, the CIA has even actively promoted coups on more than one occasion, as we all now know. So the political outrage at the possibility of Russian interference is pretty hypocritical, but I guess it makes good copy for the more rabid liberal and conservative groups.

2.      It seems to me highly unlikely that whatever Russian interference there was had any appreciable effect on the election.  It seems to me the election was actually decided by the Democrat’s choice of an exceedingly poor and problematic candidate, by the resentment of the Sanders wing of the party and how they were treated at the convention, by the incompetence of the Clinton campaign strategists, and by then FBI director Comey’s off-again on-again handling of the email scandal. I don‘t think the Russians had much effect in the face of so much incompetence.  

3.      In fact, it appears that the major, and perhaps most worrying election interference came from within our own government’s judicial and intelligence communities. The public evidence available to date increasingly points to politically-motivated interference and spying directed by senior FBI and intelligence agency managers. The desperate attempts by the FBI and the intelligence community to avoid providing key documentation to the Senate and House oversight committees investigating suggest they are very worried about what will be revealed. And I note that although special prosecutor Muller has indicted several lesser people for lying to the FBI, no one has yet indicted ex-FBI director Comey, his top aid Andrew McCabe, ex-national intelligence director James Clapper, or CIA director John Brennan for lying to the FBI and/or Congress, although they have all subsequently publically admitted to doing so, or have been shown by public records to have done so.. Perhaps the upcoming Inspector General’s report, if it is truly impartial and hasn’t also been politically tainted, will deal with some of this.

In general, I think my prediction of some months ago that the Democrats may well come to regret opening the whole Russian can of worms  is coming true. The investigations haven’t yet much affected Trump, but they have certainly badly damaged the legacy of Obama and his administration, and worse may yet come.