Thursday, March 14, 2019

The emperor’s new clothes

In the current American anti-elitist and anti-intellectual political atmosphere, the ongoing college admissions cheating scandal makes great press, with wonderful villains. But in truth, there is nothing here that we all didn’t already know about the inequality and failings of the American higher education system.

We already knew that Ivy League colleges were big corporations that worried far more about building huge (tax free) endowments and lucrative salaries and posh offices for the administrators (more deans than professors in some cases) than about educating the students, despite their expensive marketing propaganda.

We already knew that donating a building or endowing a chair, or knowing a trustee or looking rich enough that one might be persuaded to make a donation, was a reliable way of getting a child into the college.  

We already knew that most college undergraduate education (and a good bit of postgraduate education) doesn’t prepare students for the world of work. Indeed, the so-called “distribution requirements” that for example required a math major to take English literature or foreign languages, supposedly to “broaden” their education, were really in place to ensure that the less popular English departments or foreign language departments got enough students to survive.

We already knew that SAT and ACT coaching schools existed to help the well-off do better on their admission tests (though few know that research shows that just taking the test several times is about as effective as an expensive coaching school).

We already knew that Ivy League students tend to do better on average than students from other schools, simply because they usually come from wealthier families who could afford better private k-12 education (not to mention better health care and nutrition) before college, and whose connections get them better jobs after graduation. On top of that, these schools have enough applicants that they can pick from among just the top 1% or less.  In fact there is little or no evidence that Ivy League school actually provide a better education than many state universities.

We already knew that the real point of going to an Ivy League school for many students, and for many parents, is simply to be able to say one went to that school – to get the “branding” of an Ivy League education.

Of course if one wants to work in one of the fields controlled by “old boys networks”, like high powered Manhattan legal firms, then attending the “right schools” matters, because one meets “the right people”. It than case the old saying fits: “ It’s not what you know but who you know that matters.

So titillating as this story is, it doesn’t really tell us anything new about how the rich work the system to their advantage. Money always talks!