Thursday, August 16, 2012

What are the hard truths?

A friend, reading my last post, asked a good question – if a candidate were to decide to risk their political future and actually tell the voters the hard truths, what would those truths be?  Here, I suggest, are a few of them:

1. We can’t keep borrowing 40% of the federal budget each year. In fact, we can’t continue to borrow ANY of the federal budget each year.  We not only have to stop growing the federal debt, we have to begin to pay some of it back, to get it back down at least below 80% of GDP within the next decade or so.  That means we have to cut something like $2 Trillion out of each year’s appx $3.8 Trillion federal budget – more than half. Yes, that means an awful lot of government workers and contractors will lose their jobs, and a lot of federal agencies will have to be downsized or eliminated completely. We might spread the downsizing out over a few years, and do as much as possible with attrition, but the jobs will have to go – we simply can’t afford all of them; we are bankrupt as a nation.

2. There is no way to cut that much out of the budget without reducing Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security payments, since these make up close to half (42%) the federal budget right now.  Yes, it will be painful.  Yes, it will require that seniors pay more for their medical care, and that doctors and hospitals and pharmaceutical companies  figure out how to cut their costs substantially and live on lower profits. Yes, it will mean that we can’t all have the very best medical care. That’s the real world – like it or not.  Americans had just better learn to take better care of themselves, lose some weight, stop smoking, eat less junk food, and shop competitively for their medical care. The alternative is to keep going the way we are until the whole system collapse catastrophically, which would be far, far more painful.

3.  Many of the jobs lost in this recession will never come back.  Ignore the glib promises from politicians about restoring American manufacturing. It just isn’t going to happen.  The world has changed. America can prosper, and have a wealth of high-paying jobs, if and only if we train up our young workforce for the technological, innovation-driven, knowledge industries of today’s world.  That means we have to rethink and renovate our educational system from kindergarten to graduate schools, whatever the teacher’s unions think, whatever the state and local educational bureaucracies think, whatever the college faculty councils think.  And we have to do it with about half the money per pupil we currently spend, which means innovation, not more money, has to be the solution.

4. We have to cut our military budget about in half. It can be done, and still leave us with the largest, best-equipped military in the world. But it means less exorbitantly expensive gold-plated weapons systems, fewer manned aircraft, fewer military bases, and smaller ships. It also means politicians (especially Presidents) have to keep a check on their tendency to use the military to try to solve their foreign policy problems. And of course it means Congress has to wean itself from the undue influence (and donations) of the defense industry. Painful, (for a politician) but necessary.

5. We have to revise and drastically simplify the tax code. America companies spend billions each year trying to comply with (and evade) the (currently 13,458 page) tax code. Tax loopholes are so bad that companies like Exxon Mobile and General Electric can legally pay no taxes on BILLIONs of dollars of income. Yes, lots of politicians will get heat from corporations and special interest groups who see their tax loopholes disappearing, but this situation is ludicrous. And yes, we probably will have to raise the real taxes on everyone, at least for a decade or so, to help us out of this hole.

6. We have to stop subsidizing ANYONE.  And that includes the oil and gas industries, farmers, green energy startups, etc, etc. Government is lousy at choosing the right industries to support anyway – it does it on the basis of political influence, not facts.  Market forces do it much better. But more to the point, when we don’t have enough money to do essential things, we can’t afford to keep subsidizing industries that simply aren’t competitive enough to make it on their own in the markets. And guess what?  A lot of those industries will discover they can do just fine without the federal subsidies, once they have the incentive to figure out new, more efficient ways to operate.

That are some of the hard facts an honest politician might tell his/her constituents, and I bet the majority of politicians know this perfectly well – they just lack the political will to be honest with the voting public.