Thursday, February 22, 2018

America's enemies?

Amidst all the warlike talk from some US political figures and some media talking heads, who are the real enemies of America?

Russia certainly was an enemy during the Cold War years, because it wanted to export its communist system (which was really just another dictatorship) throughout the world. But today’s Russia is a shell of its former Soviet self, with a declining and aging population and an economy about the size of Italy, and no longer seeks to export its political system. Russia has brilliant designers of ships and aircraft and tanks, as good as anything the West has, but can’t afford to build or operate and maintain very many of them and doesn’t have the industrial base to sustain a major war with the West. They are certainly a regional power, and their understandable paranoia about the West (after Hitler’s and Napoleon’s invasions) means that they will continue to maneuver to gain influence around their borders. President Putin has been extraordinarily good at punching above his weight in international affairs and wrong-footing American policy. But Russia is no existential threat to America despite its nuclear arsenal, and although Russia and America have different agendas on many issues, there are many other issues on which we can work together productively.

China is a rising power, though still a regional one. China historically has been the dominant Asian power, and would like to regain that position. China doesn’t aspire to control the world, just to control Asia and be recognized as a major world power. Like Russia and many other countries, its birth rate is falling as its population becomes educated, and by about 2030 the population is expected to stabilize and then begin to slowly decline. In industrial and intellectual power China is approaching the US and may soon surpass it. There is no doubt that China is fast becoming America’s main commercial rival in world markets, but that doesn’t mean they are necessarily an enemy. If China threatens anyone it is Russia, with a thinly-populated Russian Siberia encompassing vast natural resources beckoning to China’s population.  And in fact China has a historical claim to Siberia, which was essentially taken from them by Russia in the 1860’s, not so long ago as national memories go. As is the case with Russia, although China and America have different agendas on many issues, there are many other issues on which we can work together productively.

Iran has a leadership that uses hatred of America as a means of maintaining political legitimacy within the country. But this leadership is aging, and the younger generation of Iranians actually admire America and things American. Moreover they are largely secular; despite the theocracy ruling Iran mosque attendance, especially among the young, is very low. And of course Iran doesn’t have an economy of a size to support a major war; it was strained to its limit just in the war with Iraq. So although Iran may continue to be a spoiler in the Middle East mess, it certainly isn’t an existential threat to America.  I suspect that if we just wait a while, the older generation of theocrats and revolutionaries will die off and Iran will revert to a Westernized Persian culture, though perhaps a fairly corrupt one, since the Revolutionary Guards have managed to gain control of most of the economy to enrich themselves.

North Korea of course has been blustering a great deal lately, as it has in the past. But realistically Kim Jong-il really just wants one thing – for his totalitarian regime to survive. He doesn’t aspire to take over the world, or even to take over South Korea. He doesn’t aspire to export his system to other places.  He doesn’t even aspire to be a serious commercial competitor to the US in world markets, or to oppose our policies in other parts of the world. He just wants to survive, and his nuclear program and posturing is aimed only at that – survival.  That is why sanctions and international pressure are unlikely to ever drive him to give up his nuclear program. In the long run containment until the system collapses of its own inconsistencies and inefficiency  is probably the best route, though given the effective brainwashing of the North Korean population that may take a long time – 50 years or more.  

The Islamic jihad currently roiling the Middle East will continue to produce terrorist attacks. But these, while painful and potentially expensive, are hardly an existential threat to America or any other nation. There is no mass army, no massive industrial base in this Islamic jihad to support a major confrontation with America.  Terrorists from this movement will continue to bedevil the world for decades to come, and stir up a lot of publicity (which we would be smarter not to give them), but realistically they are not an existential threat to the nation, even if they were to manage to pull off a major attack, like a dirty bomb in a major city.

And who else is there who might threaten America, whose national interests conflict so badly with ours that they might go to war with us, and who have an economy able to sustain such a war?   That’s not to say that there won’t be local clashes here and there from time to time, but I don’t really see any prospect of a major war in the next few decades unless politicians badly mishandle things (though they have done that before, as in World War I).

That’s not to say that we should just sit back. If we want to shape world events we need to keep our economy strong, our industrial base healthy, our population well educated and skilled, our military up to date and well trained, and our intelligence system functioning well (certainly better than it has been recently).. A nation in decline, whatever the reason for that decline, invites testing by others who aspire to replace it.  But it seems to me all this talk of America’s enemies is just political fearmongering. We have no serious enemies at the moment, unless it is ourselves.