Is there some significance to the fact that while several
conservative news sites today are reporting evidence that the FBI knew about
and covered up bribes and pay-for-play payments (including an hour speech that
the Russians paid Bill Clinton $500,000 to give, and several million dollars
donated by the Russians to the Clinton Foundation) while Hillary was Secretary
of State (and which she never reported, despite having promised in writing to
report all foreign donations to the foundation while she was Secretary of State)
and while she was approving the sale of a 20% stake to the Russians of a
critical uranium mine, the mainstream news is ignoring this story in favor of a
complaint that Trump didn’t call fast enough the family of a soldier who died?
Is there some significance to the fact that several of the
key players in the current special prosecutor investigation into alleged
Russian-Trump ties, including the special prosecutor himself, were apparently
aware of the FBI evidence, yet neither notified Congress nor opposed the sale,
yet none of this – so far – is being reported in the mainstream press?
Strange how the liberal mainstream press is trying still to
link Trump to Russia (with no hard evidence yet appearing), yet is ignoring the
Clinton-Russia story.
Posts
