Tuesday, July 8, 2014

How much of a threat is Russia, really?

Americans have a habit of greatly overestimating their major rivals.  Perhaps it goes along with the perennial worry that America’s best days are over, and that we are in terminal decline. Now there is a great deal of public anxiety about the moves Russia, under President Putin, are making in the Ukraine.

There is no doubt that Russia is a major regional power. Nor is there any doubt that Putin can – and probably will - continue to make things troublesome around Russia’s borders and in the UN Security Council.  And of course Russia still has a significant nuclear capability. But is Russia really an existential  threat to us as a super power, or even to Western Europe?  I think not.

The reason is the same as in my last post: “It’s the economy, stupid”.  Russia simply doesn’t have enough of an economic base to sustain a major conflict. In fact, it is quite likely Putin recently pulled his troops back from massing on the Ukrainian border in part because he couldn’t afford to keep them there very long. Russia, in fact, is on the verge of a major recession – they were there before the current sanctions were put in place, and even the very minor sanctions that Europe and America put in place have tipped the Russian economy closer to recession. Serious sanctions would quickly – within weeks or at most months – put the Russian economy into free fall, a fact which Putin certainly knows and which is no doubt restraining his hand in the Ukraine.

Indeed, I suspect Putin also knows his economy really couldn’t sustain a prolonged war in the Ukraine if he did invade.  And it would be a long war. The Ukrainians, at least in the Western two-thirds of the nation, are pretty angry with Russia now, and although the Russian army could certainly capture the territory pretty quickly, I suspect they understand that the guerrilla war that would follow would probably be as bad as their experience in Afghanistan, if not worse.  In fact, there are already signs that Russia is having some trouble, and some public opposition, with the high costs of supporting the moribund Crimean economy, now that they have annexed it.

At the moment, the economies of America and its allies are FIFTEEN times as big as the Russian economy. Nor is there any real prospect of Russian’s economy getting significantly stronger in the foreseeable future, because it is so culturally enmeshed in endemic corruption, from the lowest traffic cop to Putin himself. And because it is currently largely an extractive economy, based on exporting oil and gas – the Russian manufacturing base and infrastructure are still largely the same inefficient and antiquated ones inherited from the old Soviet system, and for the most part Putin has not attempted to update them to make them competitive in the world markets.

Russia can certainly afford to design and build and show off a small fleet of advanced fighter planes, or a few pretty advanced ships for its navy.  But they can’t afford to give them the continuous and intensive training that America gives its fighting men and women. Nor to build and maintain the immense logistics system a modern armed forces needs to project its power beyond its own borders. Which is probably why Russia is depending mostly on its well trained but small cadre of special forces to surreptitiously lead so-called  “popular rebellions” in Eastern Ukraine – it’s all they really can afford to do, though that does seem to be enough to keep the Ukraine in turmoil.