Friday, April 7, 2017

So here’s the Democrat’s problem

We are coming up on the end of the first 100 days of the Trump administration, and the Democrats have a real problem. Far from imploding (though CNN has tried its best to make it look like that), Trump has actually moved ahead smartly to fulfill the very campaign promises that got him elected.  He has eliminated many of the Obama executive orders that conservatives and businesses didn’t like, he has toughened our immigration policy (with the result that there has been a drastic drop in illegal immigrants across our southern border since January), and he will today get his first Supreme Court nominee approved. And the stock market and the economy have both improved markedly. It is true that his first attempt at repealing ObamaCare failed, but that may just be a tactical setback. Already the Tea Party Freedom Caucus, seeing that they can’t get it all their own way, has softened its opposition. And if he does nothing, ObamaCare is in a fiscal death spiral anyway, despite the valiant attempts by its supporters to claim otherwise.

And last night he showed, with the missile attack on the Syrian airbase in response to the Syrian nerve gas attack on a rebel village a few days ago, that unlike Obama, he is willing to back up his red lines. That will strengthen his support among voters, as well as strengthening his hand in dealing with people like the North Koreans or the Chinese.

Liberals have spent this time getting outraged and hyperventilating over one thing after another, and pursuing one conspiracy theory after another, mostly to do with Russian interference in the election (apparently Obama administration interference, or DNC interference,  or media interference doesn’t bother them). They have been almost childish in their response. What they have not done is get organized to try to win back some seats in local or state or national legislatures, which is the necessary first step to getting back into power. In fact what was most noticeable about the Democrat’s futile effort to filibuster Neal Gorsuch’s nomination was that they were rudderless and leaderless, responding almost mindlessly to their most extreme hyper liberal base. I see no sign of any strong leadership emerging yet, nor any sign yet of serious strategic thinking and planning.

Liberals clearly hoped that Trump would simply fail spectacularly in office and their liberal candidates could walk in next election and pick up the pieces. That isn’t going to happen. They are going to have to work, and work hard, to get back in power. They are going to have to talk with - not talk at - people they don’t agree with in order to win them back over.  They are going to have to rethink some of their more left-wing positions and reshape them enough to be acceptable to more people. They are going to have to stop being emotionally outraged (as good as it makes them feel)  and start thinking tactically. And they are going to have to wean themselves off their fascination with the wealthy Hollywood and Wall Street set and get back on friendly terms with their historical base – the working class. And it’s not clear to me that they are willing, or perhaps even capable, of doing that.

This worries me, because I actually support many – perhaps even most – liberal causes. Not the far-left socialist ideas, which appealing as they sound are simply unworkable and unrealistic. But certainly the more centrists goals – eliminate gender and racial discrimination, equal opportunity (opportunity, not outcome) for all, protection of the environment, job security, etc, etc. But the way things are going so far it will be a long time, if ever, before Democrats regain enough political power to defend these causes effectively.

I hope I am wrong.  Bill Clinton managed to revitalize the Democrats last time they were in the wilderness, and perhaps someone like him (and Hillary certainly isn’t the one!) will eventually emerge to get the Democrats off their childish whining jag and back to serious politics. I hope so.